Showing posts with label san mateo county short sale. Show all posts
Showing posts with label san mateo county short sale. Show all posts

Sunday, July 1, 2012

San Mateo County Short Sale/REO Stats

It's time for the short sale/vs REO round-up for the first half of 2012. Today I will do the entire county, and then will break down the numbers by city.

So, in San Mateo County from Jan 1, 2012 until June 30, 2012 there were:

517 closed short sales
430 closed bank owned home
Total sales during this time period were 2520
Total % Short Sales: 20%
Total % REO Sales: 17%
Total Percentage San Mateo County Distressed Properties: 37%

This is still a significant number in terms of percentages and at this percentage they are bound to have an effect on the overall market.

If you have any questions about short sales or foreclosures in San Mateo County please feel free to contact me.

Marcy Moyer
Keller Williams Realty
www.marcymoyer.com
marcy@marcymoyer.com
650-619-9285
DRE  01191194

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Why Hasn't My Offer For menlo Park Short Sale Been Submitted Yet?

Question: We wrote our offer over a week ago. Why hasn't the listing agent presented it yet? The offer has expired. Should we withdraw? Are they playing games and using this to get a better offer?

Answer: Good question. In our area if a seller or agent believes there are going to be multiple offers or wants to have multiple offers they will often set a date for offers and either not present any offers until that date, or keep presenting offers as they come in until that time.  In this case the short sale was listed right at market value, not below market in order to stimulate multiple offers, and the agent said offers will be presented as they are received.  The agent told me he had the flu and was not able to get together with the client. I spoke to him on the phone and he does sound very sick. He is not faking the illness. He is an independent broker with no agents working for him who could meet with the sellers. While this is not particularly convenient for us, I believe he is telling the truth.

Real estate transaction involve trust and are not always predictable. Sometimes you trust one of the parties is doing the right thing and they are not, but many times they are. This agent knows you wrote a great offer and are very likely to stick it out for the short sale process

So the bottom line is if you want the house you should hang in there and if you do not want the house withdraw the offer. But you have no control over what the agent does, what the lender does, or what the seller does. You need to do what you want and what is best for you and hope the other parties in acting in their best interests coincide with your best interests.
Marcy Moyer
Keller Williams Realty
650-619-9285
D.R.E. 01191194
Marcy Moyer Keller Williams Realty Palo Alto, Ca. Specialist in Trust and Probate Sales

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Silicon Valley Short Sales Arms Length Transactions: Are They Too Onerous?

Menlo Park Short Sale
Arms Length Transactions in Silicon Valley Short Sales Is It Too Onerous?
When a seller sells their home as a short sale, most lenders  will make everyone, the buyer, the seller, and the agents sign and notarize an Arms Length Transaction document. This states that the sellers and buyers do not know each other, are not related, and the seller will never again, EVER, live in the house , or ever make any profit off of the sale of the home. They can never rent the house or ever buy it back from the new owner.
The intention of this rule is obvious. The banks do not want to sell a home for less money than is owed on it and then have the seller get the benefit of being able to own the home for less money than they originally promised to pay for the home. I am not going to take sides here on whether the seller or the bank has the moral high ground on this. I am just going to say that the banks have made a decision that it is in their best interest not to reduce principal on most loans, but allow a short sale with new owners instead.
In addition to not being able to buy back the house for less money, or have a friend or relative buy the house for less money, the seller is also not allowed to rent the house, ever. This is where I start to have a problem. Some  banks have been allowing foreclosed owners to stay in the homes as renters which makes a lot of sense. The house does not get stripped or destroyed and the renter has a relationship with the house which will help preserve the home's value.  So why can't a seller rent from the new owner in a short sale? Many of these sellers do not have money to move and except for HAFA short sales or an occasional generous bank they are not given moving expenses.  It may be hard to find a place to rent after having some credit hits from missed mortgage payments or high credit card bills due to trying to keep up with the mortgage. It seems like an onerous rule to me, and one that does not directly benefit the bank anyway. Why should the bank care who the next owner rents to, especially if the original bank no longer owns or services the note?
And most importantly, what is wrong with a little humanity? Why can't families stay in their familiar surroundings, keep their children in the same schools, have the same neighbors? Isn't is enough punishment to lose your home, your equity, and your savings?
What do you think?
Marcy Moyer
Keller Williams Realty
650-619-9285
D.R.E. 01191194
Marcy Moyer Keller Williams Realty Palo Alto, Ca. Specialist in Trust and Probate Sales